Cinema Magic: Mask and Myth

封面图片


如何引用文章

全文:

2020 is the year of the 125th anniversary of cinema, which came into being thanks to the Lumiere brothers as a technical attraction. The article analyzes the process of the formation of cinema as a form of art and as a kind of medium, the magic of which lies in the psychological impact on the viewer, the ability to involve him in the audiovisual space. Already at the beginning of the 20th century, cinema acquires the status of the most popular art and retains this position in the digital era. The basis of its spectacularity is a synthesis of technology and creativity, masks of the “star” and myth.

Considering the peculiarities of cinematic magic from a historical perspective, the author proves that Georges Méliès was the first to master the magic of the screen, steering cinema along the path of spectacle. The first masks of the “stars” as screen brands (Andre Deed, Max Linder, Douglas Fairbanks, Mary Pickford, Harold Lloyd and Buster Keaton) contributed a lot to this process. Much credit for the development of cinema as an art form belongs to Charles Chaplin and his famous “Chapliniada”, which is based on the social mask of the “little man”, which Chaplin turned into a universal human image. The “star system” which nourished the Hollywood empire influenced the film aesthetics and the development of cinematic genres. An important role in this process was played by the “myth stars”, among whom Asta Nielsen, Rudolfo Valentino, Greta Garbo, Marlene Dietrich stand out in the history of cinema.

By addressing the problem “a star in Soviet style: a mask or a social type?” The author examines the ways of development of Russian cinema in its polemics with commercial Western cinema, proving that the synthesis of creativity and ideology made it possible for our filmmakers to create outstanding works of screen art in different periods.

受限制的访问

Статья Natalia

доктор культурологии, профессор, заведующая кафедрой культурологии и социально-культурной деятельности


Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin
, 19 Mira street, Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk region, Ural Federal district, 620002

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: urfo@bk.ru

References

  1. Aleksandrov G.V. (1976) Epoha i kino [Era and the movie]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1976. – 288 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Bart R. (2008) Lico Grety Garbo [Greta Garbo's Face]. Bart R. Mifologii [Mythologies]. – Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt, 2008. Pp. 133-135. (In Russ.).
  3. Bert D. Marlen Ditrih [Marlene Dietrich]. – Moscow: Eksmo, 2007. – 352 p.
  4. Vulyf V., CHebotary S. (2009) Velikie zhenshchiny XX veka [Great women of the XX century]. – Moscow: Eksmo, 2009. – 749 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Dadun R. (1994) Frejd [Freud] / Per. s franc. D.T.Fedorova. – Moscow: Izd-vo “H.G.S.”, 1994. – 512 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Delyoz ZH. (2004) Kino [Movie]. – Moscow, 2004. – 624 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Zvezdy nemogo kino [The silent film star]. Moscow-Vladimir: AST, Zebra E, 2008. – 330 p.
  8. Ilyinskij I. Biografiya // URL: https://www.culture.ru/persons/4555/igor-ilinskii (data obrashcheniya: 22.06.2020). (In Russ.).
  9. Ilyinskij I. (1974) Sam o sebe [About himself]. – Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1974. Pp. 259-260. (In Russ.)
  10. Kisunyko V. (2008) Asta Nil'sen [Asta Nielsen]. Zvezdy nemogo kino [The silent film star]. Moscow-Vladimir: AST, Zebra E, VKT. 2008. P. 37. (In Russ.).
  11. Kozincev G.M. (1983) AB! Parad ekscentrika [AB! Parade of the eccentric]. Sobr. soch. v 5 tt. T. 3. – Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1983. Pp. 72-75. (In Russ.).
  12. Krakauer Z. (1974) Priroda fil'ma. Reabilitaciya fizicheskoj real'nosti [The nature of the film. Rehabilitation of physical reality]. Per. s angl. – Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1974. – 442 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Kuleshov L.V. (1979) Chto nado delaty v kinematograficheskih shkolah [What to do in film schools]. L.V.Kuleshov. Statyi. Materialy; sost. A.S.Hohlova. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1979. Pp. 155-160. (In Russ.).
  14. Menegetti A. (2001) Kino, teatr, bessoznatel'noe [Cinema, theater, the unconscious]. T. 1. – Moscow: Ontopsihologiya, 2001. – 384 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Nilysen A. (1971) Bezmolvnaya muza. Vospominaniya [The silent Muse. Memories.]. – Leningrad: Iskusstvo, 1971. – 288 p. (In Russ.).
  16. Razlogov K.E. Mirovoe kino. Istoriya iskusstva ekrana. – Moscow: Eksmo, 2011. – 688 p. (In Russ.).
  17. Saduly ZH. (1957) Istoriya kinoiskusstva [History of cinema]. – Moscow: Inostrannaya literatura, 1957. – 463 p. (In Russ.).
  18. Pudovkin V.I. (1974) Rabota aktera v kino i sistema Stanislavskogo [The work of an actor in movies and the Stanislavsky system]. V.I. Pudovkin. Sobr. soch. v 3-h tt. T. 1. – Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1974. Pp. 260-300. (In Russ.).
  19. Ejzenshtejn S.M. (1964) Principy novogo russkogo filma. Doklad v Sorbonskom universitete [The principles of the new Russian film. Report at Sorbonne University]. S.M.Ejzenshtejn Sobr. soch. v 6 tt. T. 1. [Collected works in 6 tt. T. 1.]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1964. Pp. 547-559. (In Russ.).

补充文件

没有额外的文件显示


版权所有 © Kirillova N., 2020

##common.cookie##