Modern Art History As a Human Science in a Situation of Cultural Turn

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Intensive development of knowledge in the 20th century, including the emergence of new sciences and humanities, constantly creates a problematic situation in the sphere of art, shifting art’s designation to what in the philosophy of science is known as “normal science”. This is associated with the idea of art as a science that has reached a stage of maturity and consistency and, therefore, complies with its norms. The concept of art as “normal science” is characterized by a certain degree of conservatism, as it presupposes art’s selfprotection against deviations from the established methodology.

However, sometimes the artistic processes of modernity require different approaches. In addition, the emergence of new humanities shifts the already established methodology of art. This happened in the first decades of the 20th century, in the era of a linguistic turn in the humanities, indicating the invasion of natural sciences in the humanities; and this is happening today, at the turn of the 21st century, in a situation of a cultural turn, the emergence and intensive development of the science of culture. The current turn requires
a deeper understanding of the structure and components of art history, i.e., its sub-disciplines: art history, art theory and art criticism.

The essay argues that in the situation of cultural turn the theory of art can carry out functions which the other two sub-disciplines cannot. It propounds that art theory is able to make a decisive contribution to the elucidation of two problems: the relationship between art and cultural studies and the problem of historical time, which is important both for contemporary art and for art history.

Restricted Access

Khrenov Nikolay

Доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры эстетики, истории и теории культуры ВГИК

Государственный институт искусствознания Министерства культуры РФ, сектор зрелищно-развлекательной культуры (Москва)
, 125009, г. Москва, Козицкий переулок, д. 5

Author for correspondence.

SPIN-code: 4302-1429


  1. Grabar I. (1974) Pisma. 1891–1917 [Letters. 1891–1917]. Moscow: Nauka. 1974. (In Russ.).
  2. Kosikov G. (2000) ‘‘Struktura’’ i/ili ‘‘Tekst’’ (Strategii sovremennoy semiotiki). Frantsuzskaya semiotika: ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu [“Structure” and/or “Text” (Strategies of modern semiotics). French semiotics: from structuralism to poststructuralism]. Moscow: Progress, 2000. (In Russ.).
  3. Lazarev V. (1978) O metodologii sovremennogo iskusstvoznaniya [About the methodology of modern art history]. Sovetskoye iskusstvoznaniye. Vypusk 2. Moscow, 1978. (In Russ.).
  4. Mezhuyev V.M. (2012) Ideya kultury. Ocherki po filosofii kultury [The idea of culture. Essays on the philosophy of culture]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. Universitetskaya kniga, 2012. (In Russ.).
  5. Prokofyev V. (1978) Khudozhestvennaya kritika, istoriya iskusstva, teoriya obshchego khudozhestvennogo protsessa: ikh spetsifika i problemy vzaimodeystviya v predelakh iskusstvoznaniya [Art criticism, the history of art, the theory of the general art process: their specificity and problems of interaction within the limits of art history]. Sovetskoye iskusstvoznaniye 78/2. Moscow, 1978. (In Russ.).
  6. Propp V. (1969) Morfologiya skazki [Morphology of a fairy tale]. Moscow: Nauka, 1969. (In Russ.).
  7. White L. (1997) The Science of Culture. Anthology of Cultural Studies. Vol. 1 [The science of culture. Anthology of cultural studies. Vol. 1]. Interpretations of culture. St. Petersburg: University book, 1997. (In Russ.).
  8. Fuko M. (1977) Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk [Words and things. Archeology of the Humanities]. Moscow: Progress, 1977. (In Russ.).
  9. Khanzen-Lyove O. (2001) Russky formalizm: metodologicheskaya rekonstruktsiya razvitiya na osnove printsipa ostraneniya [Russian formalism: methodological reconstruction of development based on the principle of elimination]. Moscow, 2001. (In Russ.).
  10. Khyoyzinga Y. (2010) V teni zavtrashnego dnya. Chelovek i kultura. Zatemnenny mir [In the shadow of tomorrow. Man and culture. The darkened world]. St. Petersburg, 2010. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2019 .

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies