Dramaturgy of the character of the tempter devil in the movie

Cover Image

Cite item

Full Text

The article discusses dramatic techniques that contribute to the formation of the image of the seducer in the context of a film production. The seducer is usually a manipulator who provokes his victim and manipulates her personal needs and desire for forbidden pleasure. Such a character always plays on other people's weaknesses, as he has enough information to implement his manipulative strategies. To do this, the seducing manipulator uses a psychological or real mask, hiding his true face and intentions behind it. The image of the seducer in films is often correlated with the image of the devil, since the manipulator is the personification of evil, acting for his personal benefit with the help of lies and pretense. However, the visualization of the image in question is not always carried out in a classic mythological or religious manner, but can only be an intellectualized concept of evil. The external features of the seducing character become less significant than his behavioral characteristics. The game element in the image of the demonic seducer is the presence of a mask and the hidden intentions of the character who plays a manipulative game, pursuing his selfish goals. Such character types in most cases include scammers and swindlers, but the motive of seduction can be also realized through the anthropomorphic incarnation of the devil on the screen. An integral element of temptation is mystery. In fact, mystery is only the outline of the object of desire, its ideal image, which is drawn by the fantasy of the tempted person. A mystery can be an object of seduction, but it also lies in the image of a seducing protagonist. The image of the devil, in its turn, is portrayed in the dramatic structure of the film in a similar way, since such a character has a dual nature and hides his true face under a mask, which makes him shrouded in mystery.

Restricted Access

Batova Maria A.

Post-Graduate student of the Department of Film Dramaturgy

S.A.Gerasimov Russian State Institute of Cinematography (VGIK)
, 3, Wilhelm Pik street, 129226 Moscow, Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: mana93@mail.ru


  1. Abdusamedov A.I., Aleynik R.M., Alieva B.A., i dr.; pod obshchey redakciey M.P. Novikova (1985) Ateisticheskiy slovar' [Atheistic dictionary]. 2. Мoscow: Politizdat, 1985. 512 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Arabov YU. N. (2009) Masterklass-01. Kinodramaturgiya [Master class-01.Sreenwriting].Moscow: ARTkino, Miriskusstva, 2009. 84 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Docenko E.L. (1997) Psihologiya manipulyacii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita. [The Philosophy of Manipulation: Phenomena, Mechanisms, and Defense]. Moscow: CHeRo, 1997. 344 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Fyodorov YU. V. (2000) Obraz d'yavola v kul'ture i iskusstve konca tysyacheletiya. Problema eticheskogo otnosheniya iskusstva k dejstvitel'nosti [The image of the devil in the culture and art of the end of the millennium. The problem of the ethical relationship of art to reality]. Kul'tura narodov Prichernomor'ya. 2000, № 14, pp. 54–58. (In Russ.).
  5. Propp V. YA. (2000) Istoricheskie korni volshebnoj skazki [The historical roots of a fairy tale]. Moscow: Labirint, 2000. 336 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Rassel Dzh. B. (2001) D'yavol. Vospriyatie zla s drevnejshih vremen do rannego hristianstva [The perception of evil from ancient times to early Christianity]. St. Petersburg: Evraziya, 2001. 408 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Rassel Dzh. B. (2001) Knyaz' t'my. Dobro izlo v istorii chelovechestva [Prince of darkness. Good and evil in the history of mankind]. St. Petersburg: Evraziya, 2001. 408 p. (in Russ.)
  8. Razlogov K.E. (1982) Bogiid'yavoly v zerkale ekrana: Kino v zapadnoyreligioznoy propagande [Gods and Devils in the Mirror of the Screen: Cinema in Western Religious Propaganda].Moscow: Politizdat, 1982. 224 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Sandulov YU. A. (1977) D'yavol. Istoricheskiji kul'turnyj fenomen [Devil. Historical and cultural phenomenon]. St. Petersburg: Lan', 1977. 192 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Hyojzinga J. (2018) Homo ludens. CHelovekigrayushchij [Homo ludens. Man playing].Moscow: Azbuka Attikus, 2018. 400 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Frejd Z. (1990) Psihologiya bessoznatel'nogo: Sb. proizvedenij [Psychology of the Unconscious: Sat. works]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1990. 448 p. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2020 Batova M.A.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies